

In the first case, only the font family statement is used. Just got on the phone with Founder's customer service. The authorization of embedding fonts in documents is described in Microsoft typography, and the embeddability of these topics is editable Document, so the use of the image does not infringe, you provide the document is infringement. Of course, there is no copyright problem On the contrary, if you want to embed Microsoft YaHei font into a web page and think how good it is that YaHei can be displayed on the mobile terminal, no one can protect you. If you only use CSS to refer to the user's Microsoft YaHei on the web page, then the font is owned by the user. If the font file is written in your CSS file by Base64 encoding, there will also be copyright problems.įont is used in the picture, If the picture also is on your server, also can have copyright to askIt depends on how you use it.


If the font file is on someone else's server, it is the same as the first situation.

If the font file is on your own server, there will certainly be copyright problems. The second situation is a little more complicated, It can be further divided into three situations: If the subject simply states the font on the page, then there is no problem (confirmed with Microsoft and legal affairs). It's like you say that Xiaoming is sb, but whether Xiaoming is sb has nothing to do with you. Reference web font through font face.įor the first way, because your website server only provides CSS declaration, the font file is provided by the user's client, So your page has nothing to do with font infringement at all. There are three aws certified solutions architect associate salary ways to use fonts in the page: Please see clearly, the background of the question is: in the page. The details depend on whether the user system has this font. It only provides the system with a list of fonts. The font in the web page is matched by the font family of CSS. Will the use of Microsoft YaHei in the website constitute infringement?
